Inference engineering services
GPU inference optimisation
We tune model serving to help you handle more requests on your existing GPUs. Compare cost, throughput, latency, memory use and errors on your workload before choosing a configuration to deploy.
Discuss your workloadFrom our team's past work
35%
Lower inference infrastructure costs
Our team's past work includes a 35% reduction in inference infrastructure costs.
For your workload, we set a baseline for cost, throughput, latency and quality before choosing changes.
When this helps
For teams running GPU models with queuing requests, variable first-token or tail latency, or memory limits under changing traffic. Also for teams needing to understand batching, throughput and response time trade-offs before changing serving configuration.
Establish a serving baseline
Define the model, GPU resources, request shapes and serving configuration. Measure queue time, time to first token (TTFT), tail latency, throughput and errors on representative inputs rather than relying on a single average.
Separate prefill (prompt processing) from decode (token generation) where measurements allow. Their resource use and delays differ, helping locate whether waiting comes from queued work, prompt processing or generation.
Review queueing and batching behaviour
Observe how requests wait and how batching changes as traffic varies. Batching affects how much work the GPU handles together, but its impact on response time depends on request lengths, arrival patterns and serving setup.
Use controlled load conditions that resemble the target workload. Compare throughput with first-token and tail latency, and record errors or resource pressure so throughput changes include their service impact.
Check memory use and model settings
Review GPU memory use, including space for active request context such as the key-value (KV) cache. Request length and concurrency affect how much context fits, so operating conditions matter when evaluating capacity.
Quantisation and other serving settings may change memory requirements and output behaviour. Assess options against the model's quality needs and workload measurements rather than assuming consistent behaviour across hardware.
Compare changes under controlled load
Select experiments based on observed bottlenecks and compare them using consistent inputs and load conditions. Track queueing, TTFT, tail latency, throughput, memory pressure and errors together to see if changes serve more requests effectively on existing hardware.
Document sustained request rate, test duration and response-time distribution for each configuration, including quality changes or errors. The handover records these operating conditions, the configuration to deploy, monitoring and a rollback plan.
What you receive
- Workload and configuration baseline: request patterns, queueing, TTFT, tail latency and throughput.
- Review of prefill and decode behaviour, batching, concurrency and GPU memory use where measurable.
- Controlled comparisons of selected serving or quantisation settings, including quality and error checks.
- Agreed configuration changes with monitoring guidance and a rollback plan.
Common questions
Will batching always increase throughput?
It depends on request patterns, model, hardware and serving configuration. Measure throughput alongside queueing, TTFT, tail latency and errors under representative load.
How many concurrent requests can our GPUs support?
We test the request lengths and arrival patterns your product needs against agreed latency and quality targets. The report lists tested concurrency, sustained request rate, duration, hardware, runtime and errors so you can judge capacity for that workload.
Do you evaluate quantisation?
Where relevant. Any comparison checks memory and serving behaviour alongside output quality and errors for the specific model and workload.
Start with one workload
Tell us what runs today, where cost or latency causes problems, and which quality requirements must hold. We agree scope, price and timeline before implementation.
Book a 30-minute callPrefer email? [email protected]